Monday, November 17, 2014

Print is the Past

            We have come far as a society. From the days of passenger pigeons and typewriters, we have come to a day and age where you can communicate with a person halfway around the world in an instant. Computers replaced typewriters, then with the development of the internet and smartphones, there was no need to print out information; people had everything they could need at the tip of their fingers.  In Joseph A.’s blog post, “Digital World” he provides further evidence that we are past the point in history where we need to print information to get it out to the world. He is correct, and the world should heed his words.
            Print is having an extremely negative effect on our environment. Paper could live on for extremely long periods of time, in tree form. Once trees become paper their life expectancy drastically drops. Then once the information is no longer needed, the paper is discarded, “a person can use their mobile device for many years before upgrading to a newer one” (A). Joseph calls for people to recycle used paper, but if everyone switches to digital, recycling is no longer even needed and therefore the efforts needed to get people to recycle can be redistributed to more pressing needs.
            Digital is also much easier to transport than print; bringing a kindle onto a train is substantially easier than bringing an entire library. While I am not as concerned with annoying the people around me as Joseph seems to be, it is still a valid concern, and gives another advantage to the digital side of this debate.  Joseph also is concerned with the ink that rubs off on one’s hands from newspapers (A). No one wants filth all over their hands, and then inevitably on their clothing, print is dirty.
            Everyone loves to share their interests with those closest to them. If we were stuck in the days of strictly print, it could take hours, possibly weeks to get an interesting article to a friend (A), depending on your vicinity to them. In our current technologically advanced age, a person can email and entire article, or screen-shot a snippet, and send it to a friend instantly. Digital is bringing people together by easing their communications.
            While some people may still enjoy the feel of turning the pages of a new book, or the smell of a freshly printed newspaper (as weird as that may sound to some), their time to enjoy those is coming to a close. Digital is taking over in all aspects of the media, even billboards that were once printed, then laid in the same ways as wallpaper, are being replace by upgraded digital billboards that can cycle through multiple advertisements.  Cancel your magazine and newspaper subscriptions, throw out your book collections, buy a laptop and a tablet, and enjoy all of the above. Wherever you want, whenever you want, digital is here to make your life easier.



Work Cited
A., Joseph. “Digital World.” ENG 101 MD Joseph A. Blogger.com. 29 October 2014. Web 11 November 2014.

Monday, November 10, 2014

Digital vs. Print
            Information is accessible to people in many different ways. Whether people learn through the newspaper or the web, society will gain vital information. In “Why Digital is Better than Print,” Dan Blank looks at a few of the reasons. As society continues to advance and expand, people must turn to digital over print, to reduce their carbon footprint and improve the ease in which they access information, proving that Blank is correct in his article.
            When a magazine is freshly printed, it looks wonderful. Firm and glistening, the pages burst with colors and entertain. Yet as time passes, those same colors that once popped begin to fade. The pages begin to wrinkle and the magazine loses its luster. On the other hand digital will look the same forever and as Blank states, “the ability to dive deep into the archives of all media to pull up relevant results the moment you need it” (Blank). Digital will stand the test of time, unlike print which will fade in piles of eyesores.
            Size matters, and in this case smaller is better. Newspapers can be large and overbearing, this point further emphasized when Blank states “that you could annoy the person next to you with the constant shuffling sound of the pages” (Blank). The ink from print constantly rubs off the pages onto everything, from fingers to clothing. Digital can be as compact as a smartphone, with no ink to stain its surroundings.
            As the world ages and societies continue to grow, people are running out of places to put garbage. Once print has come to the end of its uses, most people simply throw out the paper. Recycling is the better option, but is not always followed. Blank states that “digital certainly consumes energy, but the inherent waste is not as evident, as millions of copies of a single piece of content can be replicated and spread across the world in moments” (Blank), digital doesn’t need to be constantly thrown away and therefore takes up less space in our dwindling garbage space.
            As the years pass, digital will inevitably take over. Print continues to manifest itself due to it being what people are accustomed to, but it’s time is coming to an end. Smartphones and tablets make information more portable and easier to access. The days of printing are coming to a close.


Work Cited
Blank, Dan. “Why Digital Is Better Than Print.” I Feel Fine: How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love The Web. danblank.com. n. p. 5 August 2000. web. 3 November 2014.